1 February 2000
Source: http://www.usia.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=00020101.clt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml


US Department of State
International Information Programs

Washington File
_________________________________

1 February 2000

Clinton Statement on High-Performance Computer Exports

  (Loosens controls on HPC exports to certain countries)  (525)

  President Clinton has announced changes in U.S. export controls that
  will make it easier to export high-performance computers (HPC) to
  countries in Latin America, Asia, much of Africa and the former Soviet
  bloc.

  The changes that Clinton announced February 1 are part of a review of
  HPC technology advances conducted every six months to provide the
  president with recommendations on how to adjust HPC export controls.

  Clinton announced that he will raise the licensing threshold for Tier
  II and Tier III countries. Tier II countries include Latin America,
  South Korea, the Association of South East Asian Nations countries,
  Slovenia and most of Africa. Tier III countries include India,
  Pakistan, all Middle East and North African countries, the former
  Soviet Union, China, Vietnam and Central Europe.

  Licensing thresholds will continue to be lower for military end-users,
  Clinton said.

  Following is the text of Clinton's announcement 

  (begin text)

  The White House
  Office of the Press Secretary

  February 1, 2000

  Statement By The President

  In July 1999, I announced reforms to the Administration's export
  controls on high-performance computers (HPC) and semiconductors that
  were intended to strengthen America's high-tech competitiveness and
  maintain controls necessary to protect our national security. At that
  time, I directed my national security and economic advisors to review
  HPC technology advancements every six months, and to provide me with
  recommendations to adjust our HPC export controls if warranted.

  Today, based on the recommendations I have received from agencies as a
  result of their review, I am announcing additional reforms to U.S.
  export controls on HPCs. This decision reflects my commitment to a
  control system that will enhance U.S. national security by
  implementing controls on computer exports that are effective and
  enforceable.

  I have decided to raise the licensing threshold for HPC exports to
  Tier 2 countries. I have decided also to raise the licensing threshold
  for Tier 3 countries and the threshold above which proposed exports to
  Tier 3 countries must be notified to U.S. government export control
  agencies, and to adjust the Tier 3 country grouping. The
  Administration will continue its policy of maintaining a lower
  threshold for military end-users than civilian end-users. Export
  control agencies will examine the benefits of maintaining a
  civil/military differential in the course of their next review of HPC
  levels. Due to the ever-increasing rate of technological change,
  agencies will review control levels by April 2000 to determine if
  further changes are warranted.

  The changes to the pre-export notification threshold and the Tier 3
  country group require Congressional review periods of six and four
  months, respectively, before they can go into effect. I will continue
  to work with the Congress to pass legislation that would reduce these
  periods to one month, so that we can keep up with the rapid pace of
  technological change. I also will work with Congress to explore
  longer-term solutions to how we control exports of items like
  computers and microprocessors when they become widely available
  commodities.

  (end text)


http://www.usia.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=00020102.clt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml

1 February 2000

Fact Sheet: White House Update on Export Controls on Computers

  (Clinton's fourth revision to U.S. export controls) (1600)

  The White House released the following fact sheet February 1,
  providing details of President Clinton's update of U.S. export
  controls on computers.

  Following is the text of the White House fact sheet:

  (begin text)

  THE WHITE HOUSE
  Office of the Press Secretary

  February 1, 2000

  FACT SHEET

  Export Controls on Computers

  The President today announced an update of U.S. export controls on
  computers that will promote our national security, enhance the
  effectiveness of our export control system, and ease unnecessary
  regulatory burdens on both government and industry.

  Today's announcement is President Clinton's fourth revision to U.S.
  export control parameters since 1993. This action reflects the Clinton
  Administration's efforts to ensure effective controls on militarily
  sensitive technology while taking into account the increased
  availability of commodity products, such as servers and workstations,
  of which millions are manufactured and sold worldwide every year.

  The Administration's computer export controls are designed to permit
  the government to calibrate control levels and licensing conditions
  depending upon the national security or proliferation risk posed at a
  specific destination, to enhance U.S. national security by ensuring
  controls on computer exports are effective, and to minimize
  impediments to legitimate computer exports, which will help preserve
  the technological lead of the U.S. computer industrial base.

  As directed by the President in July 1999, the Administration has
  conducted a review of our computer export controls that took into
  account (1) advancements in computing technology since mid-1999, (2)
  our security, nonproliferation and other national security interests,
  and (3) the need for a policy that would remain effective for at least
  six months.

  This review found that advancements continue in the power and
  capabilities of widely available computing systems, reflecting the
  exponential growth in individual microprocessor speeds that has
  occurred since 1995. The speed of the general purpose microprocessor
  used in standard personal computers and business applications today
  has increased by a factor of eight since the Administration's 1995
  decision took effect. This growth will continue -- U.S. companies plan
  commercial sales of individual 'chips' rated over 5000 MTOPS by late
  2000. Moreover, while there are military applications across a range
  of MTOPS levels, the national security agencies have reaffirmed their
  previous conclusion that there is no definitive line that separates
  levels of computing power on the basis of their usefulness for
  military applications. (The term "military" encompasses nuclear,
  chemical, biological, missile or conventional military
  end-users/uses.) In light of this finding, the advances in basic
  computing technologies, and the problems inherent in trying to control
  commodity level items, the Administration has determined that
  widespread commercial availability of computers with performance
  capabilities up to 12,500 MTOPS makes that a realistic and enforceable
  control level.

  The Revised Controls

  The revised controls announced today maintain the four country groups
  announced in 1995, but amends the countries in, and control levels
  for, Tier 2 and Tier 3 as follows:

  Tier I (Western Europe, Japan, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand,
  Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Brazil): Exports without an
  individual license are permitted for all computers (i.e. there is no
  prior government review).

  Tier II (South and Central America, South Korea, ASEAN, Slovenia, most
  of Africa): Exports without an individual license are permitted up to
  20,000 MTOPS with record-keeping and reporting as directed; individual
  licenses (requiring prior government review) are needed above 20,000
  MTOPS.

  -- Today's decision will raise the individual licensing level from
  20,000 MTOPS to 33,000 MTOPS immediately.

  -- The President's decision today will move Romania from Tier 3 to
  Tier 2. As required by the National Defense Authorization Act of 1998,
  this decision requires a 120-day congressional notification before it
  becomes effective.

  Tier III (India, Pakistan, all Middle East/Maghreb, the former Soviet
  Union, China, Vietnam, Central Europe): Based on President Clinton's
  July 1999 decision, exports are permitted without an individual
  license up to 6,500 MTOPS, and require individual licenses for
  military end-uses and end-users above that figure. Exports without an
  individual license are permitted for civil end-users between 6,500
  MTOPS and 12,300 MTOPS, with exporter record keeping and reporting as
  directed. Individual licenses are required for all end-users above
  12,300 MTOPS.

  -- The President's decision today will maintain the current two-level
  system for civilian and military/proliferation end-users. The decision
  will raise the individual licensing levels from 6,500 to 12,500 MTOPS
  for military end-users and from 12,300 to 20,000 MTOPS for civilian
  end-users.

  -- The Commerce Department will immediately raise the licensing level
  for civilian end-users and will raise the licensing level for military
  end-users in six months, at the same time as it adjusts the level that
  triggers the NDAA notification requirement, which is discussed below.

  The 1998 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), P.L. 105-85,
  imposed a requirement for companies to provide the Commerce Department
  with prior notice of exports for systems above 2,000 MTOPS to all Tier
  3 end-users. U.S. export control agencies have 10 days to inform the
  company if it must apply for a license. The President's July 1999
  decision raised the NDAA notification level to 6,500 MTOPS; that
  decision became effective on January 23, 2000 (the end of the 180-day
  Congressional notification period.)

  -- The President's decision today will raise the NDAA notification
  level from 6,500 MTOPS to 12,500 MTOPS. The President will advise the
  appropriate Congressional committees of his decision to raise the NDAA
  notification level. By law, Congress has six months to review this
  decision, after which the change to NDAA notification level will go
  into effect.

  -- The Administration will continue to review the licensing levels and
  the NDAA notification level to determine if further adjustments are
  warranted. Given anticipated significant increases in individual
  microprocessor performance in the near term, the Administration will
  review these levels by April 2000 to determine if further adjustments
  are warranted.

  Tier IV (Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Cuba, Sudan, and Syria).
  There are no planned changes for Tier IV, current policies continue to
  apply (i.e. the United States will maintain a virtual embargo on
  computer exports).

  For all these groups, re-export and retransfer provisions continue to
  apply. The revised controls will become effective when they are
  implemented in formal Commerce Department regulations. We will
  continue to implement the Enhanced Proliferation Control Initiative
  (EPCI), which provides authority for the government to block exports
  of computers of any level in cases involving exports to end-uses or
  end-users of proliferation concern or risks of diversion to
  proliferation activities. Criminal and civil penalties apply to EPCI
  violators.

  In addition, the Department of Commerce will continue to add to its
  list of published entities of concern as a means of informing
  exporters of potential proliferation and other security risks. The
  Department will remind exporters of their duty to check suspicious
  circumstances and inquire about end-uses and end-users. Exporters are
  advised to contact the Department of Commerce if they have any concern
  with the identity or activities of the end-users. The Commerce
  Department also will work to expand its efforts -- through public
  seminars and consultations with companies -- to keep industry
  regularly informed regarding problem end-users and programs of
  proliferation concern.

  Microprocessor Controls. In addition to revising computer export
  controls, the Administration revised controls on general-purpose
  microprocessors on November 26, 1999 by raising the control level from
  1900 MTOPS to 3500 MTOPS. Export control agencies agree that general
  purpose or 'mass market' microprocessors are not controllable because
  they are used in virtually all consumer and business personal
  computers, are highly portable, and are sold in very large quantities
  through multiple distribution channels worldwide. The November 26,
  1999 change was made given the continuing increases in microprocessor
  technology. We will continue to review microprocessor technology and
  will adjust controls as necessary. We also will continue to maintain
  controls on higher performance, general-purpose microprocessors that
  are sold in small quantities for high-end computer and other
  applications, and those application-specific microprocessors that have
  military applications and are sold in relatively small quantities.

  Legislative Proposal. The National Defense Authorization Act of 1998
  requires a six-month Congressional notice period if the President
  decides to raise the level that triggers the 10-day pre-export
  notification requirement for Tier 3 countries, and a four-month notice
  if the President decides to move a country out of Tier 3. The
  six-month notice period in particular limits our ability to respond
  quickly to rapid changes in technology. We will continue to work with
  Congress to change both waiting periods to one month.

  On a longer-term basis, we will work with Congress to adopt an
  approach that permits us to adjust our export controls in a
  predictable and timely manner when we are faced with the practical
  impossibility of controlling items so widely available that they
  amount to commodity items, like computers and microprocessors, which
  are sold by the hundreds of thousands and even millions.

  Multilateral Coordination: The Administration is consulting with other
  nations in the context of our common controls on high performance
  computers, and with the members of the Wassenaar Arrangement -- the
  multilateral successor to COCOM, to ensure that they understand the
  basis for the changes in controls. We are committed to working closely
  with them to adjust multilateral controls to reflect technological
  advances and collective security concerns. Our controls are consistent
  with the purposes of the Wassenaar Arrangement -- to deny arms and
  sensitive dual-use technologies to countries of concern, and to
  develop mechanisms for information sharing among the partners as a way
  to harmonize our export control practices and policies.

  (end text)

  (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
  Department of State.)