South Asia Analysis Group 


Paper no.268

03. 07. 2001

  

home.jpg (6376 bytes)

 

 

COUNT-DOWN TO INDO-PAK SUMMIT--VI

by B.Raman

The Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Economic Affairs, Muhammad Hussain Adili, who had recently visited New Delhi, is expected in Islamabad on July 3 to urge Musharraf to finalise the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project during his forthcoming summit with the Indian Prime Minister, Mr.A.B.Vajpayee.  For both political and economic reasons, Iran is stated to be keen that there should be at least one positive agreement on a substantive issue during the summit and that this could relate to the pipeline.

The pipeline project has been pending since the days of Mrs.Benazir Bhutto (1993-96). Under pressure from the Pakistan Army and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the Benazir Bhutto and the Nawaz Sharif Governments had rejected the Iranian proposal to extend the pipeline to India.  The Army and the ISI argued that the extension of the pipeline to India would strengthen the Indian economy and, hence, this would not be in Pakistan's national interest.

Iran was not prepared to invest in a pipeline, which would cater to the Pakistani market only on the ground that the Pakistani requirements would not provide adequate returns on its investment.

Since capturing power in October, 1999, the very same Pakistani Army has been keen to have the pipeline extended to India as that would bring it much-needed foreign exchange to the extent of US $ 600 million per annum as transit fee in addition to concessional supply of gas to Pakistan by Iran on deferred payment basis.  In its anxiety for early implementation of this project with Indian concurrence, the Army regime is prepared to treat it as a stand-alone proposal delinking it from the issue of normalisation of bilateral trade relations.  Interestingly, none of the religious parties, which continue to be opposed to the normalisation of trade relations till the Kashmir issue is resolved, has opposed the gas pipeline project being treated as a stand-alone proposal.

On June 28, Musharraf held consultations with the following leaders of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) and with other pro-Pakistan Kashmiri leaders based abroad: Patron-in-Chief POK Mass Movement, and Member of APHC General Council Farida Bahen Jee, Uncle of Mir Waiz Umar Farooq Mir Waiz Muhammad Ahmed, UK-based Dr. Ayub Thukar, UK-based Raja Najabat Hussain, USA-based Mohammad Akram Dar, Canada-based Mushtaq Jeelani, Saudi Arabia-based Nazir Qureshi, Naib Amir Jammat-e-Islami (JEI) Maulana Ghulam Nabi Nowsheri, POK Prime Minister Sultan Mehmood Chaudhry, former POK President Maj Gen (Retd.) Muhammad Hayat Khan, former POK President Sardar Abdul Qayyum Khan, former POK President Sardar Sikandar Hayat Khan, POK PPP leader Sardar Khalid Ibrahim Khan, Abdul Rashid Turabi, Amir of the POK JEI, POK Liberation League leader Abdul Majid, APHC POK leaders Muhammad Siddiq Ganai, Mir Tahir Masood, Faiz Naqshbandi, Altaf Hussain, and Syed Yousaf Nasim, Brig (Retd) Muhammad Shafi Khan, Prof Nazir Shawl, and Sh Tajammalul Islam .  The party affiliations of the last three are not clear.

Briefing the press later, the Kashmir Affairs Minister in the Federal Cabinet, Abbas Sarfraz Khan, said that Musharraf made the following points during this meeting:

* "During my talks with the Indian Prime Minister, I would call for having a certain framework for the resolution of the Kashmir problem.  I would also urge the Indian leadership that dialogue must continue under a certain framework." All issues, including Siachen, could also come up for discussion during the summit.

* "The President said he himself believes that there cannot be any instant solution for all the problems and that he is going to India with an open mind and with an effort to create a conducive environment for future talks."

* The Kashmiri leaders told the President that the dialogue should not be open ended and that there was a need to have some timeframe to resolve the issue.  They also wanted that the Hurriyat Conference should also be involved in the talks.

* The Minister said that Pakistan had already asked India to include the APHC leaders in the talks.  "In fact, we have called for having leaders of both sides of Kashmir to take part in the forthcoming talks," the Minister added.  (Writer's comment: He did not attribute this to Musharraf).  In reply to questions from the media, the Minister denied that Musharraf had ever said that he was visiting India to create history.

* No third option was discussed during the President's meeting with the Kashmiri leaders.  "The meeting between the President and the Indian Prime Minister is a first step to hold a continued dialogue." Chaudhry Shujaat Husain, former Interior Minister under Nawaz Shariff, was criticized during the meeting for advocating the third option.

* In the past, there was no framework for the talks, nor was there any timetable for the resolution of the Kashmir problem.  But now, efforts would be made by the President to have some time-bound framework to resolve this issue.

* The President was optimistic about his visit to India and this was due to various developments that had taken place during his 18 months in office as the Chief Executive.  Now the President believed that there was a certain realization on the part of the Indians to resolve their differences with Pakistan.

* Indian rhetoric such as that Kashmir was an integral part of India had diminished after the Indian Prime Minister had talked to the President by telephone recently.  "This rhetoric exists on both sides." Kashmir was an unfinished agenda of the partition that needed to be resolved.

* The Minister was asked whether the Government would ask the Jihadi groups to stop their activities for some time to ensure success at the summit.  He replied: "We have no access to the Jihadi groups and we have always maintained that there is an indigenous movement in occupied Kashmir, and we are only providing them with moral and political support."

In a separate briefing for the media, some of the participants from the POK stated as follows:

* They urged Musharraf to adopt a "tough stand" on the Kashmir issue. They reiterated that the issue should be resolved in the light of the UN resolutions.

* All the leaders conveyed their reservations over the advisability of any discussions on the future of the POK and the Northern Areas (Gilgit and Baltistan).

* Musharraf assured them that though there was no fixed agenda for the talks, he would focus on the Kashmir issue.

* They called for the inclusion of Kashmiri leaders in the talks at a later stage.  They claimed that bilateralism had failed to resolve the issue in the past and, hence, the Kashmiri people should be included in the talks.

* Musharraf should visit the POK before leaving for New Delhi.

After Musharraf's meeting with the Kashmiri leaders, the so-called Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council (AJKC) held a special session under the chairmanship of Musharraf and passed the following resolution: "The Council fully supports the efforts of the Government of Pakistan for a peaceful solution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute in accordance with the wishes of its people through all possible means, including a substantive and meaningful dialogue with India.  The Council welcomes the forthcoming visit of the President of Pakistan to India which offers a historic opportunity for a resolution of the Kashmir dispute.  The Council notes with satisfaction that in his letter of 28th May, 2001 to the Indian Prime Minister and in his subsequent statements, the President of Pakistan has stressed that Kashmir would be the focus of his talks with Indian leaders.  The Council calls upon the Indian Prime Minister to engage in a substantive, meaningful and result-oriented dialogue with the President of Pakistan during the forthcoming Summit meeting to settle the Kashmir dispute in accordance with the UN Security Council resolutions. "

In an interview to the Reuters TV on June 29,Sultan Mahmood Chaudhry, the so-called Prime Minister of POK , said that he had suggested to Musharraf that the summit should agree to allow the reunion of the divided Kashmiri families on both sides of the Line of Control (LOC) and that he should persuade India to at least withdraw its troops from big cities in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) and shift them to the cantonments and allow Kashmiri politicians from both sides of the LoC to discuss the territory's future.

On June 29, Musharraf met the following religious leaders of Pakistan, who are not connected with any religious or political parties: Pir Faqir Muhammad Naqeeb ur Rehman, Sajjada Nasheen, Darbar-e-Aalia Eidgah Sharif, Rawalpindi, Pir Syed Kabeer Ali Shah, Darbar-e-Aalia Chura Sharif, Sahibzada Syed Iftikhar ul Hasan Gilani, UchSharif, Khawaja Ata Ullah Taunsvi, Taunsa Sharif, DG Khan, Dewan Maudood Masood Chishty, Pakpattan Sharif, Pir Syed Daman Shah Jialni, Thul, Jacobabad; Pir Syed Ashiq Ali ShahJilani, Kot Diji, Khairpur, Pir Syed Akbar Ali Shah Bukhari, Karachi; Pir Muhammad Fazal ur Rehman Mujadded, Karachi; Pir Syed Shamshul Amin, Pir of Manki Sharif;, Pir Dr Khalid Raza, Zakori Sharif; Sahibzada Noor ul Haque Qadri, Darbar Hazrat Sheikh Gul Qadri, Landi Kotal; Pir Khalid Sultan Qadri, Osta Muhammad; Pir Muhammad Attiq ur Rehman, POK ,Dr.  Syed Mehdi Raza Shah; Sajjada Nasheen Dargah Hazrat Lal Shahbaz Qalandar.

Musharraf was reported to have told them : " We would be going to the summit with an open mind.  I, my Government as indeed the people of Pakistan want peace in the region.  We want this region to progress and prosper which was only possible in a tension free atmosphere.  This, however, could be achieved if there was a similar commitment and reciprocity from the other side.  We hope that such a reciprocity would be forthcoming."

He assured them that Kashmir would form the core issue of his discussions with the Indian leaders as no progress could be made on any other issue without removing the major impediment in the relations between the two countries.  He also reportedly assured them that Pakistan's principled stand for resolving the Kashmir issue according to the aspirations of the Kashmiri people would not be compromised.

He reportedly said that he would go to the summit with a clear commitment to discuss the initiation of a process that would lead to the resolution of the Kashmir dispute.

Dr. Khalid Raza later told pressmen that the Ulema had stressed upon Musharraf the need for a cautious approach towards India, keeping Pakistan's national interests supreme and advised him against relegating the Kashmir issue to a secondary position under the euphoria of normalization of relations with India.  According to him, they criticised the Nawaz Sharif Government for buying sugar from India when the latter was suppressing the Kashmiris and for trying to promote bilateral trade at the cost of the interests of the Kashmiris.

Dr. Raza quoted Musharraf as claiming that but for his intervention, the Kashmir issue would not have found mention in the Lahore Declaration.

Musharraf also briefed on June 28 a group of foreign correspondents on the forthcoming summit and the domestic situation.  In a despatch to the "Washington Post", Pamela Constable, its correspondent, has mentioned the following points relating to the summit from his briefing:

* He would be "flexible" , but would not allow the summit to be frittered away on "minor irritants".  The other problems could be solved easily once Kashmir was resolved.  "I am hopeful we will not beat around the bush this time."

* He was determined to keep his meeting with Mr.Vajpayee focused on solving the Kashmir issue.  The summit would be a "farce" if it became sidetracked by other issues.

* "There must be an absolute, unequivocal acceptance of the fact that Kashmir is the issue that has bedeviled our relations ... We have to resolve it.  I would be really disappointed if we follow the hackneyed path of past bilateral meetings that have bogged down on other issues."

* He refused to say what specific proposals he would make to Mr.Vajpayee on how to resolve the Kashmir problem.  He predicted that "if both sides stick to their stated positions too rigidly, there will be no progress," but that if both are "sincere and open-minded," the Kashmir issue could be solved in less than a year.  He said he was "cautiously optimistic" that the summit would be a success.

* He brushed aside questions about whether he would rein in armed Islamic groups that support fighters in Kashmir, insisting that the Kashmiri insurgency is "indigenous".

* "The hawks and the doves in Pakistan are all saying with one voice that I must go and discuss a peaceful resolution to the Kashmir conflict.  It is more India that has a problem of hawks and doves.  I go with my hands strengthened by the people of Pakistan."

Other foreign correspondents, who attended the briefing, have reported him as making the following points:

* India should show sincerity in the talks on the Kashmir issue.  Its solution was a prerequisite for peace and stability in South Asia.

* The two countries should show flexibility to end their hostilities. "I go with all sincerity and I hope there is sincerity on their part too.'' He believed that Mr.Vajpayee was sincere, but he was under pressure from the hard-liners around him.  In Pakistan, religious and other important groups wanted a peaceful, negotiated settlement.

* "I sense that there is a gradual change toward a peaceful resolution of this dispute so that peace prevails in the subcontinent and we concentrate on the economic development of this region." 

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, and , presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-Mail: corde@vsnl.com )

Back to the top

Home  | New  | Papers  | Notes  | Archives  | Search  | Feedback  | Links

Copyright © South Asia Analysis Group 
All rights reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the author's name  are acknowledged. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes.